Rejected
One brand, three tiers
Our first direction housed everything under Plus: two free tiers, with VIP as a paid tier on top, to borrow the existing brand’s reach.
Flipkart · Product Designer II · 2022–2024
I led design for the Plus revamp and the launch of VIP, a new paid tier, splitting them into two brands after testing showed one combined programme confused 9 in 10 people.

15–18 engineers · product · visual design · marketing
Flipkart Plus had 18M members and a value problem: thin benefits, confusing eligibility, and real doubt about whether it was free or paid. At the same time we were launching VIP, a paid tier built to take on Amazon Prime, to an eligible base of 76M users: 58M to convert, and 18M existing members to retain or upgrade.
Beyond the product UX, I led the visual and motion design for marketing, the decks for C-suite approvals, the Plus brand refresh and the VIP identity, down to the unboxing of the VIP welcome box.
Rejected
Our first direction housed everything under Plus: two free tiers, with VIP as a paid tier on top, to borrow the existing brand’s reach.
In concept testing, 90% of people couldn’t tell where VIP sat, what it offered, or whether Plus was free.
So we split them. Plus stays free, with clearer eligibility and benefits for low to mid-engaged customers. VIP launches as its own premium brand, so it doesn’t inherit Plus’s reputation, with convenience-heavy benefits for the most engaged. SuperCoins became the primary benefit across both.
Across the loyalty programmes: +₹4,900 Cr GMV, +2.7% units sold and +0.4% loyal users.
Ten months after launch:
What I’d do differently: trade the sale-season deadline for real launch readiness; keep design ownership of the landing pages instead of handing assets to marketing; and invest in post-activation features that keep reminding members what they get.
Activate to change this answer.